<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Banapana &#187; Fabertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banapana.com/category/fabertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banapana.com</link>
	<description>This is your mind on media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Only the Lottery Will Bring Meaning to Your Mundane Existence</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/only-the-lottery-will-bring-meaning-to-your-mundane-existence</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/only-the-lottery-will-bring-meaning-to-your-mundane-existence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at Steve Silvers Strategic Communications Blog, he&#8217;s posted a great example of condescending advertising (my favorite kind!). This one&#8217;s for the Colorado state lottery, too, which makes all the more irritating because goading people into gambling seems like a particularly vile activity. It makes me think, too, though, that most of these state lotteries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at Steve Silvers Strategic Communications Blog, he&#8217;s posted <a href="http://www.stevensilvers.com/2009/11/the-state-of-colorado-says-you-should-gamble-because-your-life-is-pathetic.html">a great example</a> of condescending advertising (my favorite kind!).  This one&#8217;s for the Colorado state lottery, too, which makes all the more irritating because goading people into gambling seems like a particularly vile activity.  It makes me think, too, though, that most of these state lotteries use the money for education and yet I&#8217;ve never seen one commercial tout that fact.  It&#8217;s such an easy pitch.  If you win the lottery, you win, but if you lose, the kids win.  You&#8217;re essentially making a donation to public schools—the tickets should say thank you!  I suppose the state governments and their advertisers don&#8217;t think that the general putrid horde of slobbering reprobates will see any value in such an approach.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/only-the-lottery-will-bring-meaning-to-your-mundane-existence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Corporate Overlords: Your Idiots Are Coming Home to Roost</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/attention-corporate-overlords-your-idiots-are-coming-home-to-roost</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/attention-corporate-overlords-your-idiots-are-coming-home-to-roost#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article over at Scatterbox (dutifully maintained by Steven Silvers) really caught my ire. Apparently two moronic employees at Domino&#8217;s utilized 21st century technology to illustrate to the world what total disregard they have for the customers of Domino&#8217;s, sticking ingredients in their noses and spitting in sandwiches, all on video tape and all on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stevensilvers.com/2009/05/managing-the-unmanagable-employees-talking-about-your-company-on-the-internet.html#tpe-action-posted-6a00d8341c863053ef01157093aed5970c">This article</a> over at Scatterbox (dutifully maintained by Steven Silvers) really caught my ire.  Apparently two moronic employees at Domino&#8217;s utilized 21st century technology to illustrate to the world what total disregard they have for the customers of Domino&#8217;s, sticking ingredients in their noses and spitting in sandwiches, all on video tape and all on Youtube.  Of course, this <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/article/5474/the-compliance-challenges-of-social-media">caused no end of trouble</a> for Domino&#8217;s and got the suits asking themselves, &#8220;Oh crap! What do we do when our employees can use social media tools to cluster bomb our brand?&#8221;  The normal reaction is likely to put a corporate policy into zzzzz&#8230; Sorry, ever since getting out of the rat race, I can&#8217;t finish sentences with &#8220;corporate policy&#8221; in them any more.  And it doesn&#8217;t matter, because what they&#8217;re going to do is precisely the wrong thing to do.</p>

<p><span id="more-850"></span></p>

<p>Maybe part of the problem is that monolithic US corporations choose to keep large amounts of profit for their executives and choose to pay monkey pay to their counter jockies rather than see those people as a major interface with the public and invest in them.  Service jobs in the US are some of the only jobs that aren&#8217;t going to get outsourced and yet they&#8217;re the butt of the joke of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0151804/">entire movies</a>.  When was the last time you went to a fast food restaurant and thought, &#8220;What nice service.&#8221;  And yet when all you sell is a pretty crappy pizza, maybe you should consider for a moment whether good service is an important element of your business model.  You know when the last time was that I <em>did</em> think, &#8220;What nice service.&#8221;  Apple.  And nearly every time I&#8217;ve dealt with them.  Not only do I think an Apple store employee (well-trained, carefully picked, paid decently with benefits) would know better than to pull a stunt like this, I don&#8217;t think they would <em>want</em> to. I know several people that work for Apple and they would never jeopardize jobs they genuinely like.  Of course, Apple&#8217;s not a great example, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090121_101972.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_news+%2B+analysis">since they&#8217;re doing so poorly of late</a>.  Even then, <a href="http://www.vocalabs.com/pr/apple-leads-customer-satisfaction-vocalabs-tech-support-study">their success couldn&#8217;t have anything to do with their customer service</a>.</p>

<p>I would put money on what Domino&#8217;s knee-jerk reaction to this event will be, asking &#8220;How do we use technology to become the big brother of our employees, whom we clearly cannot trust?&#8221; That&#8217;s great, pay them squat, and then oppress them so that they love you so much more.  Consider <a href="http://walmartspeakout.com/speak-out/main">how well that&#8217;s worked out for Wal-mart</a>. How many resources will they now have to waste just trying to get their employees to like them again?  Companies are going to have to become aware that their brands are increasingly vulnerable to brand sabotage by employee access to wildly loud new communication mediums, and that the best medicine will be to make employees happy. And in case these dolts in suits forgot their management 101 theory, happy employees will make a better product and/or service for you. If you don&#8217;t want idiots like the above working for you, pay decent wages and give good employees incentive to hang around.</p>

<p>Instead, suits like Sharon Allen, chairman of the board of Deloitte, says things like this: &#8220;While policies are important, you have to create a solid values-based culture&#8230; that encourages employees to make good decisions about how they act inside the company and externally.”  I couldn&#8217;t synthesize my concurrence more!  Ugh.  I&#8217;m beginning to think that MBA stands for Masters in Bogus Antispeak.  I&#8217;ve said it before, I&#8217;ll say it again.  In plain English: treat your employees with dignity.  This is basic, basic stuff that corporations have been able to neglect for a long time because without unions, service employees haven&#8217;t really had an opportunity to fight back. The <a href="http://www.cluetrain.com/">playing field is leveling</a> though and if Domino&#8217;s is afraid of what their employees do on accident, just wait and see what happens when their craptastic attitude toward employees actually ticks off a media savvy one.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/attention-corporate-overlords-your-idiots-are-coming-home-to-roost/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera Unite, Typical Marketing Hyperbole</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/opera-unite-typically-marketing-hyperbole</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/opera-unite-typically-marketing-hyperbole#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not going to do an analysis of Opera Unite. The long and the short of it is that Opera (the browser maker) has made a play for the social networking space. Their claim to fame is that clarion call to freedom! Be free from your social platforms, your servers, your oppressors in the cloud! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to do an analysis of <a href="http://unite.opera.com/">Opera Unite</a>.  The long and the short of it is that Opera (the browser maker) has made a play for the social networking space.  Their claim to fame is that clarion call to freedom!  Be free from your social platforms, your servers, your oppressors in the cloud!  But as this razor sharp analysis from Chris Messina <a href="http://factoryjoe.com">FactoryCity</a> will <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/06/16/thoughts-on-opera-unite/">illustrate to you</a> Opera Unite is selling you <em>anything but</em> freedom.  I have a few things to say about that as well.<span id="more-817"></span>  Among the things that the astute FactoryCity critic points out are that:</p>

<ol>
<li>Opera makes you use their domain name</li>
<li><p>Opera sets condition on what you can and can&#8217;t share; among those things:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>upload, transfer or otherwise make available files, images, code, materials, or other information or content that is obscene, vulgar, hateful, threatening, or that violates any laws or third-party rights, hereunder but not limited to third-party intellectual property rights.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In other words: anything we don&#8217;t like.</p></li>
<li><p>You have to use their software and their software is closed source.</p></li>
<li>Also, Opera marketing makes claims to be peer-to-peer, that is, direct from your computer to your friend&#8217;s computer, but&#8230; you have to go through their proxy servers. Oh well.</li>
</ol>

<p>If you care about this sort of thing, I strongly encourage you to read Messina&#8217;s full in-depth piece.  It&#8217;s worth it.  For me, this is just yet another example of marketing bullshit, and by bullshit, I mean <a href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">the technical term</a>.  Marketing of this kind isn&#8217;t really lying inasmuch as it is bullshit.  Lying would imply that the lie-teller was aware of the truth and is conniving to keep you from it.  Bullshit is a total disregard for the truth or falsehood of any claim.  Opera is &#8220;reinventing the web.&#8221;  Bullshit.  First of all, no one&#8217;s going to revolutionize the web until something comes along that is something <em>other than the web.</em>  And second, why is reinventing something a claim worth making?  We have an old expression: &#8220;Don&#8217;t reinvent the wheel.&#8221;  The web is the wheel.  Do something new.  Stop reinventing what works perfectly well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/opera-unite-typically-marketing-hyperbole/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Advertising Strikes</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Simmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed Demon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetNewsWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Bradbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shock! The vehemence! The vigorous impetuosity! A person from a company I like a lot just revealed to his followers that he will be experimenting with putting advertising into his software. Read the comments on the page. Wow! I&#8217;m not quite sure I could get so passionate if Brent Simmons did the same with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shock!  The vehemence! The vigorous impetuosity!  <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/">A person</a> from <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/">a company</a> I like a lot <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2008/12/hit-the-deck-ta.html">just revealed to his followers</a> that he will be experimenting with putting advertising into his software.  Read the comments on the page.  Wow!  I&#8217;m not quite sure I could get so passionate if Brent Simmons did the same with <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/individuals/netnewswire/">NewNewsWire</a> but depending on how it was accomplished I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to find myself grumbling and moving on to another piece of software.  But the whole conversation among the blog hermits about how much they reviled advertising and would in fact, be <em>happy</em> to pay for upgrades rather have to look at advertising made me realize, advertising got spoiled somewhere in the 80s.</p>

<p>Seriously, advertising, you&#8217;re, like, <em>everywhere</em>.  I myself even engaged in a bit of billboard liberation when a Comedy Central (my favorite channel, btw) ad started talking to me at the urinal.  Something snapped and I dug the electronic voice box out of the ad and through it in the toilet.  Enough!  Advertising jumps around in banner ads more than a five-year-old after a 20oz coke.  And I really think that&#8217;s largely due to the fact that ads are just a fading fad.  When the whole world&#8217;s information is at folks fingertips and you&#8217;re trying to get a message to them, what&#8217;s the use in irritating them?</p>

<p>It strikes me that advertising got spoiled during the good ol&#8217; days of linear media where every fifteen minutes on the (free) radio or the free (television) it got to yack at us.  But when media goes nonlinear like the web, you just can&#8217;t afford to be that obnoxious.  Advertising needs to get its class back, like <a href="http://decknetwork.net/">The Deck</a> or like BMW films.  Class, advertising! Class! You can talk to people without shouting, you can persuade people without lying.  But in the long run, business is still going to have to get back to basics and start trafficking in real information; not shinola.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rip-off For A Reason</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/rip-off-for-a-reason</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/rip-off-for-a-reason#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rip-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing. The Republican&#8217;ts lose, big-time, and the best they can do?&#8212;rip-off Barack Obama&#8217;s web site and call it &#8220;our newest grassroots Web site.&#8221; I&#8217;m sorry, what was the one before this one? From the gradients, to the reflective surfaces, to the placement of social networking tools, to the tone, this things is a serious rip-off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing.  The Republican&#8217;ts lose, big-time, and the best they can do?&#8212;rip-off Barack Obama&#8217;s web site and call it &#8220;our newest grassroots Web site.&#8221;  I&#8217;m sorry, what was the one before this one?  From the gradients, to the reflective surfaces, to the placement of social networking tools, to the tone, this things is a serious rip-off of all things <a href="http://obama.com">Obama.com</a>.  I shouldn&#8217;t even link to this <a href="http://www.republicanforareason.com">sham of originality</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/rip-off-for-a-reason/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Important Part</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/the-most-important-part</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/the-most-important-part#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone newmedia media tactile tactilemedia mobile phones cell G1 blackberry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two significant trends in the computing industry are meeting head-on these days. First off, Computing is going mobile. Second, most of those mobile platforms are trying to integrate tactile media into their designs&#8212;look no further than the iPhone and its imitators. So why is there such a disparity in their attempts to advertise their products? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two significant trends in the computing industry are meeting head-on these days.  First off, <a href="http://www.hardware-revolution.com/the-mobile-computer-outpacing-the-desktop/">Computing is going mobile</a>.  Second, most of those mobile platforms are trying to integrate tactile media into their designs&#8212;look no further than the iPhone and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/16/t-mobile-g1-review/">its imitators</a>.  So why is there such a disparity in their attempts to advertise their products?  Surely the most important thing about a product that embraces tactile media and mobile computing is <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/gallery/ads/">the screen and interaction itself</a>?  And yet, in what would seem to be a kind of &#8220;cool&#8221; response to the iPhone, advertisers for the Blackberry Storm have decided that the ideal thing to do is to hide the interface.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll update as soon as I can find a video on the web to link to, but on the snailvision networks there are all these advertisements running for the new Blackberry with a lot of sidewalk bystanders examining the machine and saying &#8220;Wow!&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m thinking I shouldn&#8217;t have bought my iPhone,&#8221; without once showing the &#8220;real&#8221; audience the interface to the machine.  When advertising claims that, &#8220;We refuse to show the interface on the grounds that it is too cool,&#8221; they have just completely ignored the aforementioned trends.  New media these days is tactile and distributed.  Apple is &#8220;advertising&#8221; that more than any other company.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>  Exactly what is <a href="http://www.rim.com/">RIM</a> afraid of?  Also-ran shouldn&#8217;t be nearly so bad as duck-n-cover as an advertising strategy.  But when advertising, these days, is the only thing differentiating realistically commoditized products, it&#8217;s pretty important to make sure that you are &#8220;cool&#8221; as opposed to better; better that you should influence your consumers than convince them.  Inductive logic is a breeze when compared to deduction.</p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:1">
<p>I put advertising in scare-quotes because it is such a rare event when companies actually bother to illustrate their products.  Advertising has basically become synonymous with bullshit.  it&#8217;s a shame that the general populace hasn&#8217;t caught on&#8230; yet.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/the-most-important-part/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Category</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week ad last have seen some pretty strange things going on with advertising, and even though I generally put posts on advertising into the Mind Control section of the sight (because it is all just propaganda) it seems to me that it would be a good idea to introduce a new section: Fabertising.  That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week ad last have seen some pretty strange things going on with advertising, and even though I generally put posts on advertising into the Mind Control section of the sight (because it is all just propaganda) it seems to me that it would be a good idea to introduce a new section: Fabertising.  That&#8217;s Fab- as in fabrication and -ertising as in you know, &#8220;shoving bullshit down your throat.&#8221;  I would love to call the section bullshitising, but the icon for that would be grisly.  I think there&#8217;s enough manipulation of the facts in commercially developed communications directed at the public that focusing on it should generate more than a few worthy posts.  I&#8217;m also going to put summations of research here on how exactly advertising manipulates you into bad choices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
