<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Banapana &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banapana.com/tag/advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banapana.com</link>
	<description>This is your mind on media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When Advertising Strikes</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Simmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed Demon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetNewsWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Bradbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shock! The vehemence! The vigorous impetuosity! A person from a company I like a lot just revealed to his followers that he will be experimenting with putting advertising into his software. Read the comments on the page. Wow! I&#8217;m not quite sure I could get so passionate if Brent Simmons did the same with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shock!  The vehemence! The vigorous impetuosity!  <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/">A person</a> from <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/">a company</a> I like a lot <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2008/12/hit-the-deck-ta.html">just revealed to his followers</a> that he will be experimenting with putting advertising into his software.  Read the comments on the page.  Wow!  I&#8217;m not quite sure I could get so passionate if Brent Simmons did the same with <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/individuals/netnewswire/">NewNewsWire</a> but depending on how it was accomplished I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to find myself grumbling and moving on to another piece of software.  But the whole conversation among the blog hermits about how much they reviled advertising and would in fact, be <em>happy</em> to pay for upgrades rather have to look at advertising made me realize, advertising got spoiled somewhere in the 80s.</p>

<p>Seriously, advertising, you&#8217;re, like, <em>everywhere</em>.  I myself even engaged in a bit of billboard liberation when a Comedy Central (my favorite channel, btw) ad started talking to me at the urinal.  Something snapped and I dug the electronic voice box out of the ad and through it in the toilet.  Enough!  Advertising jumps around in banner ads more than a five-year-old after a 20oz coke.  And I really think that&#8217;s largely due to the fact that ads are just a fading fad.  When the whole world&#8217;s information is at folks fingertips and you&#8217;re trying to get a message to them, what&#8217;s the use in irritating them?</p>

<p>It strikes me that advertising got spoiled during the good ol&#8217; days of linear media where every fifteen minutes on the (free) radio or the free (television) it got to yack at us.  But when media goes nonlinear like the web, you just can&#8217;t afford to be that obnoxious.  Advertising needs to get its class back, like <a href="http://decknetwork.net/">The Deck</a> or like BMW films.  Class, advertising! Class! You can talk to people without shouting, you can persuade people without lying.  But in the long run, business is still going to have to get back to basics and start trafficking in real information; not shinola.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/when-advertising-strikes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Graphic Design Art?</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/creative-communism/is-graphic-design-art</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/creative-communism/is-graphic-design-art#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creative Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Warhol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, free free to answer the question for yourself. It&#8217;s not what I would consider the most scientific study, but que sera sera. I draw a distinction between graphic design and art based on what is being communicated and what is the intent of the communication. Art attempts to communicate emotion, it evokes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, free free to <a href="http://isgraphicdesignart.com/">answer the question for yourself</a>.  It&#8217;s not what I would consider the most scientific study, but que sera sera.  I draw a distinction between graphic design and art based on what is being communicated and what is the intent of the communication.  Art attempts to communicate emotion, it evokes feeling.  Graphic design has to communicate information&#8212;and I emphasize <em>has</em> to.  If an artifact of the visual medium does not communicate information (or data, to be technical about it) then it is not graphic design.  When information is communicated it <em>can</em> sometimes be done with excellence, and graphic designers want to call that art (because it is <em>their</em> art, as in trade) but other folks will still call it technical or design or advertising.  But when the emotional content outweighs the communication of the information, as in, drowns it out, then I think graphic design can attain &#8220;artness.&#8221; And mind you, I am not saying the reverse of this: that art has nothing to say.  On the contrary, art can say nothing at all or nothing specific.  In my mind, a great deal of the cleaving of the two forms comes down to Andy Warhol&#8217;s &#8220;Soup Can&#8221; and an actual advertisement for the same soup.  One form is trying to get you to think about your world, what it looks like and how it feels.  The other form is trying to get you to think about soup. [Thanks to <a href="http://kitblog.com">Kitblog</a> for today's inspiration!]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/creative-communism/is-graphic-design-art/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Category</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fabertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week ad last have seen some pretty strange things going on with advertising, and even though I generally put posts on advertising into the Mind Control section of the sight (because it is all just propaganda) it seems to me that it would be a good idea to introduce a new section: Fabertising.  That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week ad last have seen some pretty strange things going on with advertising, and even though I generally put posts on advertising into the Mind Control section of the sight (because it is all just propaganda) it seems to me that it would be a good idea to introduce a new section: Fabertising.  That&#8217;s Fab- as in fabrication and -ertising as in you know, &#8220;shoving bullshit down your throat.&#8221;  I would love to call the section bullshitising, but the icon for that would be grisly.  I think there&#8217;s enough manipulation of the facts in commercially developed communications directed at the public that focusing on it should generate more than a few worthy posts.  I&#8217;m also going to put summations of research here on how exactly advertising manipulates you into bad choices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/fabertising/new-category/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Disturbing Profit for Deception</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/mind-control/the-disturbing-profit-for-deception</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/mind-control/the-disturbing-profit-for-deception#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandlism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guerilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A blog appears on the internet, written by a man named Håkan Nordkvist who claims to have traveled to the future and that he has proof. Later, a video surfaces. Apparently, this man crawled under his sink and into the future where he met himself and took a mobile phone video of the event. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A blog appears on the internet, written by a man named Håkan Nordkvist who claims to have traveled to the future and that he has proof.  Later, a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yuhr6nUH31k">video surfaces</a>.  Apparently, this man crawled under his sink and into the future where he met himself and took a mobile phone video of the event.  The video is viewed thousands of times and debated by many.  The problem?  The entire matter was conceived by <a href="http://www.amfpension.se/templates/Page.aspx?id=3672">AMF Pensions</a> to market to a &#8220;younger&#8221; generation.  <a href="http://demo.fb.se/e/amf/timetraveller/">This video</a> is part of a portfolio of &#8220;guerrilla&#8221; marketing campaigns propagated by <a href="http://demo.fb.se">Forsman &amp; Bodenfors</a>.  The apparent logic of the marketing campaign is that you should give your money to people who are willing to deceive and lie to you for a good laugh.  The problem with this sort of campaign is that not everyone finds out that the matter is a hoax; more disinformation is created in an already incredibly noisy environment.  This kind of marketing is simply unethical and is the worst kind of propaganda because it is in no way concerned with the truth or even willing to make a case, based on evidence, for the value of the product.  It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.shelfari.com/books/27720/On-Bullshit">bullshit</a> is what it is.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/mind-control/the-disturbing-profit-for-deception/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Humor IS the Product Design</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/meme-safari/when-humor-is-the-product-design</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/meme-safari/when-humor-is-the-product-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meme Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seatbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiddy bear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of products out there that might accomplish some silly task like &#8220;stress relief&#8221; but whose real and primary purpose is humor. The Tiddy Bear more than applies here, it&#8217;s actually best in show. But I don&#8217;t want to ruin the joke for you, so watch the video and then I&#8217;ll say my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of <a href="http://stupid.com">products out there</a> that might accomplish some silly task like &#8220;stress relief&#8221; but whose real and primary purpose is humor.  The <a href="http://www.tiddybearcomfortstrap.com">Tiddy Bear</a> more than applies here, it&#8217;s actually best in show.  But I don&#8217;t want to ruin the joke for you, so watch the video and then I&#8217;ll say my piece.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gw1g2yKxb0I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x006699&#038;color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gw1g2yKxb0I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x006699&#038;color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><span id="more-431"></span></p>

<p>With people more and more saturated with advertising messages that scream about lifestyle and how to be cool, it&#8217;s actually refreshing to run into an ad that looks as though it belongs on Saturday Night Live but that is taking itself completely &#8220;seriously.&#8221;  I think the manufacturers know that they could have just released a square cube with a strap on it and called it Seatbelt Relief, and that the Tiddy Bear was clearly a better strategy.  It&#8217;s a brilliant strategy, in fact, because in an attention economy, it&#8217;s something that will get people talking and in the meantime, they&#8217;ll sell a few since it solves an albeit trivial need.  It&#8217;s still a little frustrating (to me anyway) that we&#8217;re still a culture not above manufacturing products that have two and three year lifespans as products and decades long lifespans as garbage, but whatever; I still think we&#8217;ll get there.  Asking for a totally sustainable product lifecycle for the Tiddy Bear just sounds silly, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/meme-safari/when-humor-is-the-product-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Rules Your Mind!</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/mind-control/advertising-rules-your-mind</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/mind-control/advertising-rules-your-mind#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expected utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banapana.com/advertising/advertising-rules-your-mind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to most economists we humans really are extremely rational creatures&#8212;hyperrational really, since when we make errors in judgement, such as failing to save enough for retirement, we&#8217;re really saving enough to satisfy our expected utility. But as the Economist succintly put it, &#8220;Economists make sense of the world by assuming that people know what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to most economists we humans really are extremely rational creatures&#8212;hyperrational really, since when we make errors in judgement, such as failing to save enough for retirement, we&#8217;re really saving enough to satisfy our expected utility.  But as <a href="http://www.economist.com">the Economist</a> succintly put it, &#8220;Economists make sense of the world by assuming that people know what they want.  Advertisers assume that they do not.  Who is right?&#8221;  Good question.  And the answer is: <a href="http://cognews.com/1185488770/index_html">the advertisers</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/mind-control/advertising-rules-your-mind/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Cleaning</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/comment-cleaning</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/comment-cleaning#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online casinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.troped.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew! Just got done cleaning out all the comment spam. I let it go on for WAY too long. While doing it though, I noticed two things about the comments. One, some of them were quite clever and almost tricked me out of deleting them. Two, one of the them was from Citibank! I get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!  Just got done cleaning out all the comment spam.  I let it go on for WAY too long.  While doing it though, I noticed two things about the comments.  One, some of them were quite clever and almost tricked me out of deleting them.  Two, one of the them was from Citibank!  I get that scummy pharma  dealers and online casinos have to resort to these insidious tactics, but Citibank!?
<span id="more-112"></span>
Obviously a more stringent set of rules for allowing posts on Banapana is going to have to follow. I think I will likely limit it to folks who use <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/typekey/">Typekey</a> &#8212; that seems like a good way to keep people honest.</p>

<p>But one thing that bothers me about this mass spamming kind of thing is that I&#8217;ve in the past made an effort to mention my blog on another blog and included the URL in the hopes it would get some traffic.  I suppose trackbacks are largely the same thing.  And I guess I&#8217;m not sure if I feel like I would delete comments that were commercial in intent.  If I had, for instance, just completed an entry about personal finances and Citibank wanted to jump in and explain how their services could help and provide links, I don&#8217;t think I would mind.  The obvious objection is &#8220;they should pay for that privilege.&#8221;  But let me be clear, I&#8217;m not talking about a generic comment posted on numerous blogs.  What I mean, is that if someone at Citibank took the time to make their comment directly related to my entry, I would likely leave it.</p>

<p>It makes me wonder if their isn&#8217;t a viable advertising business in sending people around commenting on blogs on behalf of businesses &#8212; a less massive and more personalized version of AdWords.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/comment-cleaning/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
