<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Banapana &#187; AI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banapana.com/tag/ai/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banapana.com</link>
	<description>This is your mind on media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>World in Crisis, Pandora Still Rocks</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/world-in-crisis-pandora-still-rocks</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/world-in-crisis-pandora-still-rocks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Warner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brit pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pandora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tings Things]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the bad news lately, I decided it was time to put together an upbeat punk-pop-rock station on Pandora so at least something sounded kind of happy, if not peppy-mad. The thing is, I could think of a few bands I wanted to seed this one with, among them, The Ting Tings and Metric&#8212;both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the bad news lately, I decided it was time to put together an upbeat punk-pop-rock station on <a href="http://www.pandora.com">Pandora</a> so at least <em>something</em> sounded kind of happy, if not peppy-mad.  The thing is, I could think of a few bands I wanted to seed this one with, among them, <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thetingtings">The Ting Tings</a> and <a href="http://www.myspace.com/metricband">Metric</a>&#8212;both good at being mad with an upbeat sound; rebels all.  But there was this other band&#8230; swedish, I think.  I hadn&#8217;t listened to them in years and just couldn&#8217;t think of the name, even though I knew it was really simple.  Well, three songs into listening to my new station who comes up but <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thesounds">the Sounds</a>!  Wow.  The very band I couldn&#8217;t recall.  Pandora borders on psychic when it does stuff like this.  By far the best music web site out there, folks.  <a href="http://www.pandora.com/stations/7f87a543b69d4af4ba73d19387cd3c75c874869f84047ca8">Tune into my new station</a> and check it out for yourself!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/world-in-crisis-pandora-still-rocks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing Powerset</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/introducing-powerset</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/introducing-powerset#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that &#8220;Semantic Web&#8221; has been trending down (at least in Google searches), it seems like more web sites devoted to it are popping up these days. I&#8217;ve been messing around with Twine for a fews weeks now and it seems pretty useful, although it definitely can&#8217;t accomplish what they claim. 1 A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the fact that &#8220;Semantic Web&#8221; has been <a href="http://google.com/trends?q=semantic+web">trending down</a> (at least in Google searches), it seems like more web sites devoted to it are popping up these days.  I&#8217;ve been messing around with <a href="http://www.twine.com">Twine</a> for a fews weeks now and it seems pretty useful, although it definitely can&#8217;t accomplish what they claim. <sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>  A new one that I stumbled into, via <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/">KurzweilAI.net</a> is <a href="http://www.powerset.com">Powerset</a>.  My 30 second review is that I tried searches on two pretty obscure subjects that I&#8217;ve been reading about lately, the St. Petersburg factor<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" rel="footnote">2</a></sup> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriegsspiel">kriegsspiel</a>.  Basically, I got the same search results at wikipedia, powerset and google&#8212;no immediately discernible differences.</p>

<p><span id="more-382"></span></p>

<p>A few nice things do stand out about Powerset.  The ajaxy integration of content into the search results page is definitely a step up from Google&#8217;s fairly wimpy page snippets.  This feature alone would make it much easier to peruse results for accuracy and usefulness.<sup id="fnref:3"><a href="#fn:3" rel="footnote">3</a></sup>  I&#8217;m also impressed with the fact that Powerset appears to be gathering data from <a href="http://www.freebase.com">Freebase</a>&#8212;an important open source database of information that&#8217;s a fundamental step towards creating a semantic web.</p>

<p>But if you ask Google and Powerset the question, &#8220;What is math?&#8221; you get pretty different answers.  Google says:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>a science (or group of related sciences) dealing with the logic of quantity and
  shape and arrangement</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Powerset says:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>MATH is an American Improv/experimental band formed in Woodstock, New York in the mid 90s.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>While this may be true, I don&#8217;t think it wins the semantic claims any points.  True enough, if you ask &#8220;What is mathematics?&#8221; you get a better answer.  But shouldn&#8217;t a search engine claiming semantic abilities understand synonyms?  Apparently, not yet.  But I&#8217;ll definitely keep using Powerset and report back as I understand more.</p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:1">
<p>In short, they claim that it can be a replacement for Del.icio.us and your blog and most things social.  They don&#8217;t apparently understand some important rules about personalization in this regard.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

<li id="fn:2">
<p>Weirdly, no one, including Google, had any information about this, which seriously makes me question its existence, since I&#8217;ve only seen one reference in a book so far!  I&#8217;ll definitely have to post about it later.&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

<li id="fn:3">
<p>This reminds me, I <em>really</em> wish someone would create a feature that would allow you to eliminate search results from repeated searches.  Like, let me save a search and then slowly cull it down to what I think are the relevant results.  The data from those individuals who did the culling would surely be useful to the search engines.&#160;<a href="#fnref:3" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/introducing-powerset/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IF and AI?</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/if-and-ai</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/if-and-ai#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troped</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Balo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aqua Teen Hunger Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chatbots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHG2G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infocom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Shake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zarf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took a long sojourn into the history of interactive fiction (IF) with my launching pad being the stunning revelations unearthed by Andy Balo over at waxy in regards to the never-completed Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to the Galaxy text adventure sequel. But after reading that, and poking around the archives and playing a few great examples [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a long sojourn into the history of interactive fiction (IF) with my launching pad being the stunning revelations unearthed by Andy Balo over at <a href="http://www.waxy.org">waxy</a> in regards to the never-completed Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to the Galaxy text adventure sequel.  But after reading that, and poking around the <a href="http://www.ifarchive.org/">archives</a> and playing a few <a href="http://www.eblong.com/zarf/if.html">great examples</a> of IF, I started wondering why more hasn&#8217;t been done to advance the interface of these games?  Why not incoporate more AI?<span id="more-371"></span></p>

<p>From what I can gather, all these old text adventure games are mostly written in something called Z-code and generally speaking, the only way to access most of them is through a Java applet on the web or one of several free downloadable interpreters; unfortunately, all of which choose to exactly emulate the old terminal style screens.  On large screens, it&#8217;s terribly unpleasant to read.  So, my first thought was, why hasn&#8217;t the interface been updated to take advantage of the slick typography of modern computers?  I think people would take more interest in some of the <a href="http://www.eblong.com/zarf/if.html">newer, award-winning fiction</a> created, if this were the case.</p>

<p>And the other thing that I found frustrating is that the commands and command structure hasn&#8217;t changed the least in 20 years.  My Master Shake bot on AIM can do more with regular English than any of these games.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup> Every time I said &#8220;look calendar&#8221; and the program responded &#8220;I don&#8217;t know what you mean,&#8221; I found myself wondering, <em>why not</em>?   In fact, my bot knows a few things about people and places from the Aqua Teen Hunger Force world.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s hard at all to see that interactive fiction could be greatly improved with some simple AI.  I&#8217;m going to take a shot at an interactive short story using just ALICE.  I think with the right variables (and Jquery interface), it will be possible to build a much smarter interactive fiction.</p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:1">
<p>You can see for yourself and talk to him on AIM at mast3rshak3bot.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/its-thinking/if-and-ai/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
