<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Banapana &#187; web users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banapana.com/tag/web-users/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banapana.com</link>
	<description>This is your mind on media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Media Gets the Game</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/corporate-media-gets-the-game</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/corporate-media-gets-the-game#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.troped.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picked this story up from Buzz Machine. Chevy is the latest of the big corporations trying to get a piece of the Live Web (more affectionately known to the technorati as Web 2.0) The New York Times reports that Chevy has launched a site that allows web users to make their own ads. Splendid. User [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked this story up from <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/04/04/the-price-of-converstion-is-worth-it/">Buzz Machine</a>.  Chevy is the latest of the big corporations trying to get a piece of the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12015774/site/newsweek/">Live Web</a> (more affectionately known to the technorati as <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html">Web 2.0</a>)  The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/04/business/media/04adco.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">reports</a> that Chevy has launched <a href="http://chevyapprentice.com/">a site</a> that allows web users to make their own ads.  Splendid.  User participation.  Excellent.  Of course, when you do that sort of thing people are always apt to <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=XA6dLFrAFlI&amp;search=chevy%20tahoe">use the opportunity to criticize</a>.  Strangely enough, despite the harsh words from some participants, Chevy&#8217;s media company is taking the whole thing in stride.</p>

<blockquote>&#8220;We anticipated that there would be critical submissions,&#8221; Ms. Tezanos said. &#8220;You do turn over your brand to the public, and we knew that we were going to get some bad with the good. But it&#8217;s part of playing in this space.&#8221;</blockquote>

<p>I second Buzz Machine in saying I&#8217;m impressed that they get it.  Nice to see that the big guys do occasionally play nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/corporate-media-gets-the-game/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Basics Software Design</title>
		<link>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/back-to-basics-software-design</link>
		<comments>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/back-to-basics-software-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use open source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banapana.troped.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday&#8217;s post got me thinking. To sum up, computers are getting faster but software is getting bulkier and slower. While that&#8217;s probably a fair generalization, in the world of web browsers, there have been several notable exceptions of late. For years, users have had to choose between Netscape and IE, both of which are notably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://banapana.troped.com/archives/2005/01/_jakob_neilsen.html">Yesterday&#8217;s post</a> got me thinking.  To sum up, computers are getting faster but software is getting bulkier and slower.  While that&#8217;s probably a fair generalization, in the world of web browsers, there have been several notable exceptions of late.  For years, users have had to choose between Netscape and IE, both of which are notably large for a web browser and not particularly quick at rendering pages. (I&#8217;m not linking to either of them, good reader, because I do not endorse them)  However,  Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a> was one of the first browsers to come along that bucked this trend, being quick, largely bug-free and very fast.  Now for the PC and Mac, <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">Firefox</a> is causing <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/">quite a storm</a>.  In its recent spate of a massive number of downloads, it has only gained 1% of the marketshare but a million downloads on its first day of release is something to pay attention to.
<span id="more-17"></span>
From reading about people who have made the switch from Internet Explorer to Firefox it seems clear that people are frustrated with IE and looking for an alternative primarily due to IE&#8217;s lackluster security features.  I&#8217;ve even found several recent stories <a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/local/chi-0501020309jan02,0,4708121.story?coll=sfla-business-headlines">like this one</a> that point to people who are unplugging their computers from the internet do to their frustration with spam, spyware and viruses, oh my!</p>

<p>It&#8217;s always been a secret desire of mine to sue <a href="http://www.macromedia.com">Macromedia</a> for Flash&#8217;s antics.  No program I have ever worked with has been so completely prone to random crashes and bizarre bugs or mis-documented code.  But I&#8217;m not just using it for fun.  It&#8217;s my job.  If I&#8217;m hired to work in Flash then my lost work and time spent restarting Flash and banging my head against a nearby desk is money out of my pocket (and a health risk).  Is it so hard to understand that I feel maybe Macromedia owes me something?</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t flip out: I&#8217;m just as anti-litigation as anyone.  It&#8217;s a pipe dream to think that in the current social climate anyone is going to sue a software company like Macromedia and get away with it.  But in a rapidly advancing technological world where <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/05/1539203&amp;tid=126">our lives</a> come to depend more and more on bugs not happening in our computer systems, I doubt the shrug generating quality of bugs is going to last too long.</p>

<p>The truth is, it&#8217;s not going to continue.  The other shoe is going to drop &#8212; maybe soon for Redmond.  If common web users are willing to completely unplug from the web or do something as unorthodox as use open source software we may be seeing the beginnings of a technological society unwilling to accept technological glitches as a par for the course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://banapana.com/uncategorized/back-to-basics-software-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

